If there
is one thing to be learned from this course, it is that there is an immense
gray area in defining deviance. As
mentioned in my very first blog post, “deviance can be described as breaking a
rule of society; doing something or acting in a way that can be considered out
of ‘the norm.’ It can also provoke disapproval (Thio, Calhoun and Conyers).” But deviance is much greater than that, or is
it much smaller than that? One can interpret it either way. Deviance can be
described as much greater than breaking a rule of society because there is a
much variance based on who is committing the act, what they are doing, when
they are doing it, where the act is being done, and the reasons why it is being
done. Here is an example of what I mean:
If a teenager was drilling a whole in the pavement with a jackhammer, he would
have police called on him but if an adult with a hard hat was doing it, people
would assume he is a construction worker. Going along with that same idea; if an adult with
a hardhat was drilling a hole with a jackhammer in your neighborhood at 2:00am,
people would think he is a lunatic but if an adult with a hard hat was drilling
with a jackhammer on the state highway at 2:00am, people would drive by with
caution knowing that this man is doing his job. Similarly, if a random
teenage boy was drilling with a jackhammer in your neighborhood, he would get
the police called on him but if a teenager was drilling on the pavement in
front of his house with his father’s guidance, neighbors would talk about the
importance of father and son bonding over a hard day’s work. So you see, this
one act of using a jackhammer can be considered deviant based on who, what,
when, where and why it is being done.
As I
mentioned, deviance can be described as much smaller than that too because of
the underlying social reasons for deviance. It is essentially a made up concept
used to differentiate the “normal” from the “abnormal.” So essentially,
deviance is only a big deal because society makes it a big deal. Here is an
example: In this society, having a learning disability is considered deviant. It’s
a big deal to be considered academically challenged and there is big social institution
focused around identifying these deviants and classifying them on a different
scale. Well what if that social construction did not exist? What if every student
was accepted for who they from the time they enter school to the time they
exit? What if students were not accepted to be at a certain level at a certain
age and were instead allowed to learn at their own pace without being labeled
or judged if they did not attain a desired score on a standardized test? If this
were the case, “deviance” wouldn’t be that big of a deal because “saving” a
student from getting labeled deviant wouldn’t be a priority and the idea of
being different wouldn’t even occur to people. The whole concept of identifying a student with a disability to make sure that he is not considered deviant alienates the student and makes him get labeled as deviant anyway.
Unfortunately
for us, we do not live in a society which accepts you for the content of your character
but instead judges you on every aspect possible. We are exposed to a culture
that systematically judges, alienates, and discriminates based on height,
weight, sex, gender, cultural background, social class, education level, level
of physical ability and anything else that can differentiate the “majority”
from the “minority” and establish a group of “desired” and “undesired”
individuals.
This video demonstrates
the sad reality of people’s perception about a man’s height. People have absolutely
no control of how tall or how short they are but are forced to live with a
label their whole life if they do not meet a certain height criteria. This label
fallows you when you are trying to get a date, get a job or be taken seriously
in your social circle. Looking beyond a person’s height, society seems to have
a definition of a “real man” and a “real woman.
As you can see, men in society have a very clear and distinct idea of what it means to be a man and they go to great lengths to be tough guys. It is these ideals that drive individuals in society to label others deviant if they do not fit the mold of what is defined.
This video displays the
advertising schemes used to sell the mainstream image of “normal” as it
pertains to what women should look like. The women portrayed in the media, in
movies and advertisements, in commercials and billboards all across America are
fictitious creations of Photoshop and airbrushing. The video explains how these
ideals of beauty can never be achieved yet people are spending millions of
dollars on products so that they can look like what they see on television.
The above cases are a
small fraction of what deviance is, who and how someone may be considered deviant
and some underlying roots as to why the system works the way it does. This is
just the tip of the iceberg however considering there is a whole other side to
deviance; a criminal side. People in a society that commit a crime as defined
by that society are considered deviant and there are many theories that try to
explain the concept of crime as a form of deviance. Conflict theory says that people are continuously
competing for resources; Feminist theory says that men and women commit different
kinds of crime at different rates due to the social construction of each of their
respective roles in society; labeling theory explains that deviance is a label
given to a person or group that is the minority in displaying cultural norms (Thio,
Calhoun and Conyers)
With all these theories,
one can only wonder who is considered deviant, at what times, under what circumstances
and why? Unfortunately, there is not a handbook that one can study so that they
may know who is deviant and why but what is more unfortunate than that is that
no one needs one because everyone already knows. Everyone reading this knows
exactly what is deviant as soon as they see it. Why is that? Why do we alienate
people as a society instead of being able to accept each other for our
differences? It is sad to think that there are millions of people in the U.S.
that are going through some type of emotional or psychological distress because
they don’t feel accepted by society. It is sad to think that some of those
people may resort to hurting themselves or others as a result of lashing out to
the society that rejects them.
I challenge anyone who
reads this to think about all the times you have labeled someone deviant
weather it was vocalized or just mental. I challenge readers to think about
every time you used the word fag or gay or queer and meant it in a negative
way; to think about all of the times you judged someone, made fun of someone or
rejected someone because they had a certain style or a certain hair cut or talked
different or looked different. Some sociologists argue that we are all a product
of our environments; well does that mean that we have to conform to the norms
of our environments if they are wrong; if they instill hate and discomfort in
our hearts when we see something that is abnormal to us? I Challenge everyone
to look around at the culture and its teachings we are submerged in and exposed
to and I challenge you to challenge everything that is wrong with it because that
is the only way to make a positive change.
Reffernces
Book: Readings in Deviant Behavior
Videos taken from Class Blog:
Height and the perception of Success
Tough Guise
Killing them Softly 4: Advertising's image of women
Word Count: 1,363
Reffernces
Book: Readings in Deviant Behavior
Videos taken from Class Blog:
Height and the perception of Success
Tough Guise
Killing them Softly 4: Advertising's image of women
Word Count: 1,363
No comments:
Post a Comment